Hmm, NDAs that are not there 

The last post generated quite a stir, and I know why, but I deleted it anyway.

I'm actually not under Whidbey NDA, but to keep myself from disclosing something that is one month from being publicly available, and to keep everybody who has a hard time being silent about this happy, I'm shutting it down.

Thanks for reminding.

Categories:  Other
Saturday, 04 October 2003 08:05:42 (Central Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Comments

 

Saturday, 04 October 2003 16:46:48 (Central Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
NP. You should also remind your contact who got you the CLR libraries, as that person was under NDA. It's only a month away (supposedly) from being a public beta, but with the recent flare over IP being leaked (like HL-2), I think people are paying more attention. Plus, I'm not sure which "version" of the product will be publicly released. People on the JDP/Alpha teams will continue to get interim releases with new features & fixes to the CLR & the product. Just because the beta went public, doesn't mean that the new stuff that this group gets from MS can be discussed.

Anyway, good job on the retraction.
Sunday, 05 October 2003 08:53:18 (Central Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
;)

The chain of broken NDAs seems to be long.
It will be resolved in about three weeks, anyway.
All comments require the approval of the site owner before being displayed.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview
Copyright © 2003-2019 , Matevž Gačnik
Recent Posts
RD / MVP
Feeds
RSS: Atom:
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
Legal

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my company's view in any way.

My views often change.

This blog is just a collection of bytes.

Copyright © 2003-2019
Matevž Gačnik

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail